Here’s Hockey!

I can’t get over how great this NFB film from 1953 looks. Though it’s in black and white, it looks like it was shot yesterday.

The National Film Board is one of our great assets, and I’m so pleased that they’re getting all of these terrific films online. (Choose High Quality for best results, though even standard quality looks pretty damn good. Did I mention this film is over 50 years old?)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Commercials help you enjoy television?

From the Freakonomics Blog today:

In a plot twist worthy of Lost, it turns out that TV commercials aren’t obnoxious interruptions after all. They’re helpful interruptions, which increase your enjoyment of TV by periodically reminding you how much you’d rather be watching your favorite show.

That’s according to a new study published in the Journal of Consumer Research, which found that commercials restore a sense of novelty to TV programming by breaking up the cycle which we become bored with following what’s on the screen.

In one of several experiments, the study’s authors screened the sitcom Taxi for two groups. One group saw an episode with commercial interruptions, and the other saw an episode with no interruptions. Those who saw Taxi with commercial breaks enjoyed it more, by a decisive margin.

Please Embrace This Commercial Interruption – Freakonomics Blog – NYTimes.com.

I find this an amazing and totally unexpected result. I wonder if the study can be reproduced, or tried with other forms of media.

Make fewer products, but make them great

Matt Burns writes a great piece over at CrunchGear on how Apple’s success is tied to the fact that it doesn’t confuse customers with too many choices.

There really aren’t that many products: One cellphone, four iPods, three notebooks, and three desktop computers. Now look at HP’s, Dell’s, or even Garmin and TomTom’s product lines. Apple does something different and hopefully others are taking notes.

Apple’s secret sauce: A simple product line.

This reminds me of a section in Barry Schwartz’s book The Paradox of Choice. Here is Christopher Caldwell writing about it in The New Yorker:

Research in the wake of Kahneman and Tversky has unearthed a number of conundrums around choice. For one thing, choice can be “de-motivating.” In a study conducted several years ago, shoppers who were offered free samples of six different jams were more likely to buy one than shoppers who were offered free samples of twenty-four. This result seems irrational—surely you’re more apt to find something you like from a range four times as large—but it can be replicated in a variety of contexts. Students who are offered six topics they can write about for extra credit, for instance, are more likely to write a paper than students who are offered thirty.

How Not to Fix the New York Times

Felix Salmon takes Henry Blodget to town over the Silicon Valley Insider’s mostly stupid advice on what to do with the New York Times.

How Not to Fix the New York Times – Finance Blog – Felix Salmon – Market Movers – Portfolio.com.